Friday, September 10, 2010

Back to the Basics: A Lesson in the Tech Revolution's Shortcomings

Posted by: phoblog on August 28, 2006

I agree with everything you say, with the caveat that I think its also important to acknowledge that tech-wise, things turn on a dime.

The other caveat: I have literally hundreds of channels sitting in front of me right now as well as hundreds of other OnDemand options and the internet - but there's still nothing to watch.

My base question/argument remains: Dean was brilliant to seize emerging technologies, but based on first-hand evidence relayed to me by Iowa Dean staff - there was no field operation. Do you (reader, previous commenter, anyone) think that new tech will *replace* traditional field operations or other direct-contact methods of voter communication - or will it just augment it, reaching a broader spectrum of people in new ways?

I say, at least for the next few cycles, a candidate that botches either side of this new equation is either out or will burn through resources much less efficiently.

#

Return to Back to the Basics: A Lesson in the Tech Revolution's Shortcomings

The Majority Vote
Which political dilettante/ex-corporate CEO with a non-existent voting record and ethical issues is more likely to disappoint in November?

Results

Majority Vote Archives

BlogTalkRadio
Listen to California Majority Reports on internet talk radio
The Echo Chamber
For the Week of February 3, 2008
Latest Comments
CA Wellness Foundation Credit Card Progress Report Rough & Tumble