Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Search The Archives
Log In

Register new account

Request new password

Publishers
Editors
Majority Reporters
Latest Reports
Steven Maviglio

San Francisco Bar Pilots Put Safety First While Shippers Focus on Profits

May 01, 2012 @ 11:47 AM
Steven Maviglio

It's unfortunate that the Sacramento Bee's Dan Walters didn't let facts get in the way of his attack on the San Francisco Bar Pilots and pending legislation to ensure that vessels are safely guided through the treacherous waters of the San Francisco Bay http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20120430/WIRE/120439959/1036/business?Title=WALTERS-Why-the-push-to-bump-pay-for-bar-pilots-

Here at the facts: The Bar Pilots receive no salary, no health care, no workers comp. Their income is based entirely on fees -- fees that amount to just pennies on the dollar of the value of goods transported by shipping companies, most of which are owned by foreign companies.

To maximize their profit, shippers are building larger ships for transporting their goods. Just last month, the Bar Pilots guided the largest ship ever to dock at the Port of Oakland -- a ship 250 longer that the city's TransAmerica tower is tall http://www.sfbarpilots.com/SanFranciscoBarPilotsMoveLargestCargoShip/tabid/97/Default.aspx.

That's no easy feat. It makes their jobs -- already among the toughest in the state -- even tougher. And unlike the shipping companies, many of which have racked up hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines for their disregard of Bay waters, the Bar Pilots sole focus is safety and protecting the precious waters of the Bay, which has become more difficult with the megaships.

The legislation pending in the Assembly that has been the subject of media attention would require an additional pilot on these vessels. The cost of an extra skilled pilot -- which amounts less than one percent of ships that move thru the Bay's tricky waters -- is a drop in the pocket compared to the profits made by the shpping companies. Which is why a fee for the additional service is a fair proposal; it is not a "raise."  

If Walters is truly concerned about outrageous compensation, he need only look to the shipping companies that put profits ahead of safety. For example, the CEO of one of the shipping companies earned $1.7 million last year. Where's Walters outrage about that?

Print this report | Send to a friend

About Steven Maviglio | All Reports by Steven Maviglio



Browse in : [ Reports ]

There are no comments attached to this item.

Ratings

The Majority Vote
Who is the biggest loser of the 2012 election cycle?

Results

Majority Vote Archives

BlogTalkRadio
Listen to California Majority Reports on internet talk radio
The Echo Chamber
For the Week of February 3, 2008
Latest Comments